Recensioni Steinberg Cubase SX 3 ( 7/10) - 0 recensioni

In tutto il mondo, 32 dei nostri utenti hanno votato questo prodotto : 7/10

Elenco dei membri seguiti da 3

LInguaggio	Membro	Per Cominciare1	Disponibilità/Performance2	Opzioni Generali3
	ericthegreat
	moosers
	Audiofanzine FR

• 1↑. Ci sono problemi di compatibilità? La configurazione / setup generale è semplice? Il manuale è chiaro e abbastanza dettagliato?... Le funzioni base sono facilmente accessibili?
• 2↑. Il software funziona correttamente con questa configurazione? quali performance stai ottenendo? (se quantificabile) questa configurazione (software e attrezzaturar) è stabile?... Da quanto tempo la utilizzi?
• 3↑. Cosa ti piace di più e cosa di meno di questa? Hai provato molti altri modelli prima di trovare questo? Qual è la tua opinione sul rapporto qualità/prezzo? Sapendo allora ciò che sai adesso rifaresti la stessa scelta?... Precisione e qualità del suono?

• 21/09/11

  REcensione di ericthegreat ( traduzione ) migliora questa traduzione

  See the translation of this user review with Google translate

  Per Cominciare

  Steinbergs Cubase sx3 is a great program for audio production. You will be able to compose great songs with the Cubase line of software. I have been using Cubase sx3 for a while now and its very similar to the other versions of Cubase software. I ran it on a windows xp computer with 3gigs and it ran very well and fast.

  Disponibilità/Performance

  Most of the stock sounds that come with the program I didn’t use. I am never a fan of the stock sounds that most programs come with because most of them sound thin and not full and well rounded. But after purchasing a few racks I was right in the mix and started making great music. I love the midi control with this program you can sync all of your gear up right away and very easy. Not too mention the ability to edit your midi notes, which is very easy.

  Opzioni Generali

  Overall it’s a powerful program but in my opinion since I wasn’t using any stock sounds and rewiring fl studio into this program there really wasn’t too much of a need for the program its self. Most other high quality music production software’s are just like this one, and for the price its about the same as all of the other softwares. But Cubase continues to come out with upgrades and keep improving on the product that they put out so hopefully they will find a way to separate themselves from all of the other midi softwares that are on the market today. I suggest trying other softwares if you are just starting out though, they navigation through Cubase sx3 can get to be a bit overwhelming if you are new to it. But if you are a vet and understand programs like these then Cubase sx3 will work perfect for you and you will be creating music in no time.
  Did you find this review helpful?sìno
• 01/02/10

  REcensione di moosers ( traduzione ) migliora questa traduzione

  See the translation of this user review with Google translate

  Per Cominciare

  I used Steinberg Cubase SX 3 for a brief while before I switched systems and changed over to Pro Tools a number of years ago.  I ran SX 2.0 for the most part, but also ran this version for a little while.  This version is now pretty outdated, but it does still float around there.  I didn't have any issues as far as installation goes, as it was a pretty simple process overall, however, after using it for a little while I did have some performance issues which I will speak more about in the next section.  As far as the interface of Cubase SX 3 goes, it is definitely better than its predecessor in 2.0.  It is easy to use and offers up a lot more features as well.  The manual for SX 3 is pretty complete, but I didn't need to consult it too often since it is a pretty easy piece of software to use.

  Disponibilità/Performance

  When I ran Steinberg Cubase SX 3, I ran it on a Hewlett Packard Pavilion dv8000 lap top.  The computer had a 3.0 GHz single core processor and 2 GB of RAM.  I was also running SX 2.0 on the same system before I upgraded up.  However, I found that 3.0 wasn't as friendly in terms of performance as 2.0 was for whatever reason, which is part of the reason that I switched over to a Mac and now run Pro Tools.  Every so often I would get some error messages and the whole session would crash, which is definitely not something that I was interested.  I was able to recover the session afterward without a problem.  While it didn't happen often, it was often enough where it became annoying.  However, as far as the performance of the software in terms of speed, I was able to run the software just fine with a good amount of tracks and plug-ins...

  Opzioni Generali

  While Steinberg Cubase SX 3 is definitely a powerful piece of software, if you're interested in a sequencer of this type, I'd recommend looking into the newer versions of Cubase.  Although I haven't used the new ones as extensively, they have a better interface and offer up more plug-ins and better performance.  Having said this, SX 3 is a fine piece of software on its own that will get the job done for the most part.  If you're looking for your first piece of recording software and are on a tight budget, but like the Cubase family, it might be worth it to get this version and save a bit of money if you don't necessarily need all of the new features that come with Cubase 4 and 5.
  Did you find this review helpful?sìno
• 02/12/08

  REcensione di Audiofanzine FR ( traduzione ) migliora questa traduzione

  See the translation of this user review with Google translate

  Per Cominciare

  (Originally written by dj Alec Trusk/translated from Audiofanzine FR)
  
  No installation problems. Very quick...
  
  
  
  No incompatibilities.
  
  
  
  Very easy configuration.

  Disponibilità/Performance

  AMD 5000+ Dual-Core, 3 GB Ram, 500 GB HDD, Audiophile USB sound card
  
  
  
  The software is pretty stable.

  Opzioni Generali

  I've been using it for two years. I won't change in the near future...
  
  
  
  Pros: everything...
  
  
  
  Cons: none...
  
  
  
  I tested Cubase SL2 and Cubase VST 5 and I find the SX3 version is the best one.
  
  
  
  A bit too expensive but it's worth it.
  
  
  
  I'm pretty sure I'd buy it again.

  N / A
  Did you find this review helpful?sìno

Elenco dei membri seguiti da 26

LInguaggio	Membro	Per Cominciare	Disponibilità/Performance	Opzioni Generali	Google Translation
	soundman172				leggi
	livingstudiocom				leggi
	raoul-grabu				leggi
	musimil				leggi
	daho				leggi
	rUgUeUx				leggi
	cslevine				leggi
	maryland				leggi
	delascher				leggi
	D-Klarx				leggi
	Azimut2				leggi
	Anonyme				leggi
	PanpanLikesMetal				leggi
	hugodc1				leggi
	Bluebox				leggi
	Mk-61				leggi
	superlove31				leggi
	Chris Dewitte				leggi
	coyote14				leggi
	entoine				leggi
	Erasmus				leggi
	Mat10000				leggi
	chimimic				leggi
	zipzap_fr				leggi
	gunico				leggi
	Nikoestla				leggi

Elenco dei membri seguiti da 3

LInguaggio	Membro	Per Cominciare	Disponibilità/Performance	Opzioni Generali	Google Translation
	ericthegreat				leggi
	yoTrakkz				leggi
	moosers				leggi